END OF OVER:20 | 15 Runs | SRH: 159/7 (1 run required, RR: 7.95)
- Jagadeesha Suchith14 (6b)
- Kane Williamson66 (51b)
- Kagiso Rabada3-0-25-0
- Avesh Khan4-0-34-3
SRH need 3 off 2 balls.
SRH need 11 off 5 balls. Can Williamson do this?
SRH need 16 off the last over, which will be bowled by Rabada
END OF OVER:19 | 12 Runs 1 Wkt | SRH: 144/7 (16 runs required from 6 balls, RR: 7.57, RRR: 16.00)
- Jagadeesha Suchith8 (3b)
- Kane Williamson61 (48b)
- Avesh Khan4-0-34-3
- Amit Mishra4-0-31-1
Cheithanya: "Guys, cut Vijay Shankar some slack...Dude has been bowling some very decent economical overs...And he was asked too down for his capabilities..He is a decent batsmen to bat up.."
Suchith. SRH need 24 off 9 balls
V Shankar b Avesh Khan 8 (14m 7b 0x4 0x6) SR: 114.28
bhaskar: "Watching on TV and what a gorgeous shot on 17.1 .. KW really is something else. Hope they don't even think about dropping him."
Amit: "Hard to get 28 from Rabada and Avesh Khan as their line and length and speed variations are controlled."
SRH need 28 off 12 balls. Avesh to bowl the 19th, Rabada held back for the last over.
END OF OVER:18 | 11 Runs | SRH: 132/6 (28 runs required from 12 balls, RR: 7.33, RRR: 14.00)
- Vijay Shankar6 (5b)
- Kane Williamson60 (47b)
- Amit Mishra4-0-31-1
- Axar Patel4-0-26-2
Krishna: "A tired Williamson has to face fiery Rabada next to win the game. Almost impossible task this." --- Williamson is now sipping some drinks. Yes, he looks quite exhausted
Gokul Pradeep V: "Not sure how many chances will Vijay Shankar get. Its a do or die match for him !!"
Mishra to bowl the last over. Williamson has to go after him
END OF OVER:17 | 4 Runs 2 Wkts | SRH: 121/6 (39 runs required from 18 balls, RR: 7.11, RRR: 13.00)
- Kane Williamson52 (43b)
- Vijay Shankar3 (3b)
- Axar Patel4-0-26-2
- Avesh Khan3-0-22-2
Tautoru: "The wheels have come off now. SRH need a miracle KW. "
Big ask for Vijay and Williamson. SRH need 43 off 22 balls. Axar is on a hat-trick
Rashid Khan lbw b Patel 0 (2m 1b 0x4 0x6) SR: 0.00
Will Rashid come ahead of Vijay? Yes, indeed