<
>

India feels shortchanged by FIH jury

Alex Morton/Getty Images

LONDON -- Off-field drama marred the Champions Trophy hockey title showdown as the tournament jury spent an hour and a half to find a solution after India protested against a shootout infringement against Australia.

The tournament jury seemed to be in a fix when India filed an appeal against the video umpire's decision to re-take the second attempt in the shootout. India had lost the shootout 3-1 after holding world champions Australia goalless in 60 minutes of regulation period.

It took the jury multiple replays to find a way out of the embarrassing situation that kept the result pending.

India had complained that Daniel Beale's shootout attempt was allowed to go on for more than 14 seconds and the obstruction that was cited took place outside the eight-second limit for such attempts. The score then was 1-0.

After an hour and a half of the match's conclusion, the jury eventually discovered that the ball had rolled under Indian goalkeeper's pad for a couple of seconds. The jury then cited this as the reason why the shootout was re-taken. But it still took the jury a lot of explanation to the Indian captain and coach before announcing that the result would stay.

Australia thus won the title, but both teams had to be ushered out of the ground, to send a signal for the crowd to go home.

The medal presentation was then staged in the media interview room, away from the spotlight in the middle of the pitch.

"The umpires have failed," said Hockey India president Narender Batra. "Is this the quality of umpires you post in the final of the Champions Trophy? The shootout attempt went on for over 14 seconds, and then it was re-taken. Just to cover up their shortcomings, they are now pointing out at a different incident. If the goalkeeper had made an infringement, that a penalty stroke should have been awarded."

Indian coach Roelant Oltmans said it was "an unusual end to the tournament". "To be honest, the set process should be followed," he said. "Our protest was not about the result, but important tournaments should follow the process. If something like this happens at the Olympics Games in Rio de Janeiro, just imagine the embarrassment for the game."